LAST EDITED ON Apr-17-06 AT 07:34 PM (CDST)
Who says you were trying to attack anyone??? All I said is your point is ridiculous. As far as shooting the messenger,I do not get that reference. You are the messenger of your own opinion and I think its mnore of a moral than philisophical arguement. People now a days are so sensitive. Your not a hippie are you? (thats a joke)You just do not get the point do you. If a person from Africa gets a prescription for a medication and he has no money at all to get it filled then he cannot get the medication. If a poor person from the U.S. goes to a pharmacy with a prescription and the prescription costs $60 and he only has $50.00 do you think he is going to get that medication, of course not. So that U.S. citizen is in the same boat as the person from Africa. Again when it comes to healthcare it is quite similar for anyone no matter where they come from. Yes, the average income for a person in the U.S. is much higher than a person from a 3rd world country, but the cost of living and expenditures on healthcare in the U.S. are much higher than in a 3rd world country. A person in Afrca may make $300/yr he certainly cannot afford healthcare. A person in the U.S. makes above the poverty limit, lets say $15,000/yr., do you think that is enough for health insurance? No of course not, but yet he makes many times over the person from Africa. And don't say there are options in the U.S., because the gov limits the number of people who can get assistance and it has certain guidelines in which a person is qualified and alot of people do not qualify for assistance. In Texas alone thousands of children were kicked on the medicaid rolls this past year.
As far as how much drugs cost in R & R, yes it is expensive, but the government carries alot of that burden. The Pharma company does not always pay %100 of the costs. And if you look at certain pharma companies profit reports, they are doing very well. They are making their money back and then some. And I do not think drug companies allowed these generic drugs to be prodcued, alot of companies just ignored them and produced them anyway, just like Cipla. And pharama companies have fought legal battles to stop these companies from making generic drugs. remember the bottomline is money for the pharma company they do not do anything in the name of charity unless it is forced upon them or tehre is nothing they can do to stop the outside companies from making generic drugs. For example funds the Bush administration set aside for Africa in AIDS treatments had a stipulation that African companies cannot buy the generic forms of the drugs, so they had to pay full price.
The problem is the U.S. subsidizes the rest of the worlds medications. We pay the highest prices while Europe and other countries pay far less. The pharma companies are basically screwing the American consumer. We make up the shortfall, because the rest of the world is paying less.
As far as the WHO. Yes they do some good, but its all politics and anything they try it justs gets so watered down from baragaining, negotiating, and trying to satisfy all sides that most things that come out only have a marginal effect. Its not much different from the process of getting a bill out of the U.S. Congress. Too many lobbyists and special interest groups that need to be satisfied and the end result is the average person gets no relief. As far as the legislation is intended for 3rd world countries and no one else. What does it say about the WHO that poor people in Asia or Africa can get them but poor people from the U.S. or any other country cannot have access to them.
"People like to bow down to the letter of the law, but fail to honor the heart of the law."